Anti-corruption –Tamil Nadu

Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau a specific office of the State of Tamil Nadu, liable for the examination and avoidance of defilement in the state. It was set up in 1964 as a different Department under the Administrative Control of a Director to manage the examination of defilement cases using Police faculty and its own chief Staffs .

This organization has had some expertise in battling defilement in different branches of the Government against Public Servants and Private, People who abet the offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The Bureau registers cases underneath the provisions of this Act. Besides this, the Bureau conducts inquiries basing on the information/petitions received from numerous agencies like Government, Vigilance Commission, and Lokayukta, etc. Additionally on the information/ petitions received by the Bureau from the general public containing specific and verifiable allegations of corruption against Public Servants.

Aim of the Bureau:

  • To expedite and accelerate the progress and development of the state through clear and corruption-free governance.

Goal of the Bureau:

  • To reduce corruption

  • For facilitating quicker and hindrance-free economic process.

  • For rising easy doing business and to draw in additional investments and to get additional employment.

  • For making certain hassle-free convenience of govt. services to the public and to make sure sensible governance.

Public awareness programs.

  • To educate students, public, business institutions regarding the ills of corruption.

  • To study and establish focus areas in numerous govt. departments that square measure susceptible to corruption.

We deliver subsequent services:

  • Registration and investigation of complaints of corruption.

  • Enquire and advocate action on allegations of corruption against Government and Public Servants.

  • Advice and guide internal vigilance in Government Departments.

  • Advice the public on the target of action on matters of corruption.

  • Public awareness programs.

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (No. 49 of 1988) is an Act of the Parliament of India instituted to battle defilement in government organizations and public area organizations in India. 
It stretches out to the entire of India, aside from the State of Jammu and Kashmir and it applies additionally to all residents of India outside India.

Offences and penalties

Following are the offenses under the PCA alongside their disciplines:- Obtaining an unnecessary advantage, with the expectation to perform or cause execution of public obligation inappropriately or insincerely, and so forth, and if the local official is seen as blameworthy, he will be culpable with detainment which will be at the very least 3 years however which may reach out to 5 years and will likewise be at risk to fine.

  • Taking delight so as to impact local official, by degenerate or illicit methods, will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at least long term however which may reach out to seven years and will likewise be obligated to fine. 

  • Taking satisfaction, for the exercise of individual impact with community worker will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at least a half year however which may stretch out to five years and will likewise be obligated to fine. 

  • Abetment by a local official of offenses characterized in Section 8 or 9, will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be not less than a half year but rather which may reach out to five years and will likewise be subject to fine. 

  • Local officials acquiring significant things without thought from individuals worried about continuing or business executed by such community workers will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at least a half year yet which may reach out to five years and will likewise be obligated to fine. 

  • Discipline for abetment of offenses characterized in Section 7 or 11 will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at least a half year yet which may stretch out to five years and will likewise be obligated to fine. 

  • Any community worker, who carries out criminal unfortunate behavior, will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at the very least one year yet which may reach out to 7 years and will likewise be obligated to fine. 

  • Routine submitting of an offense under Section 8, 9, and 12 will be culpable with detainment for a term which will be at the very least two years yet which may reach out to 7 years and will likewise be at risk to fine.

An investigation shall be done by a lawman, not below the rank of:

  • In the case of a city, of associate Inspector of Police.

  • In metropolitan areas, of associate Assistant Commissioner of Police.

  • Elsewhere, of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or a politician of equivalent rank shall investigate any offense punishable underneath this Act while not the order of a Metropolitan jurist or a jurist of first-class, or create any arrest thus while not a warrant.

  • If a lawman not below the rank of associate Inspector of Police is permitted by the authorities during this behalf by general or special order, he could investigate such offense while not the order of a Metropolitan jurist or jurist of first-class or create arrest therefor while not a warrant.

  • Provided any that associate offence observed sec thirteen.1.e shall not be investigated while not the order of a lawman not below the rank of a Superintendent of Police. Any such investigation while not the order of an SP or on top of rank is going to be discharged.

Amendment Act 2018

As the bar of Corruption Act, 1988 saw restricted success in preventing corruption in Government departments and prosecuting and heavy public servants concerned in corrupt practices, associate degree change was enacted (Amendment Act) and brought into force on twenty-six Gregorian calendar month 2018. The change Act tried to bring the bar of the Corruption Act in line with the global organization Convention against Corruption 2005 that was sanctioned by India in 2011.

Highlights of Amendment

  1. Definition of Undue Advantage

The bill redefines the offense of accepted bribes as “obtains or accepts or associate degree to get from any individual an undue advantage, intending that in consequence a public duty would be performed improperly or venally, either by himself or by another employee is guilty of offense underneath section seven and shall be captive for a term of three to seven years.

  1. Offering of Bribes by Person/Commercial Organization

In addition to treating bribe-giving as an associate offense, section 9 specifically provides for an associate offense by a business organization if someone related to the commercial organization offers or guarantees to present any undue advantage to an employee to get or retain business or a plus in conduct of business. Such a person/commercial organization shall be punishable with a fine, quantum of that isn't prescribed within the act.


  1. Redefining Criminal Misconduct

Any dishonorable misappropriation of any property entrusted to the general public servant or if the general public servant by design enriches himself illicitly throughout the amount of his workplace.

FAQ's

Corruption is dishonest behaviour by those in positions of power, like managers or governance. Corruption will embrace giving or acceptive bribes or inappropriate gifts, double dealing, behind-the-scenes transactions, manipulating elections, amusive funds, wash cash and defrauding investors.

The hindrance of Corruption of Act, 1988 is a vital legislation to fight with evil of corruption. It’s a good instrument to curb this evil.. We’ve to seek out the lacuna within the legislation if they exist during this legislation. We’ve to try and do away with the lawgiver provisions existing inside the Act. Equally the introduction of recent provisions into the Act also will be fruitful.

Anybody will provides a grievance or pass data to the ACB

You can contact your nearest ACB official nose to nose or through phone.

Complaints need to lean in writing. However, data will be passed on otherwise additionally e.g. through phone, e-mail, or in person to ACB officers.

What is the protection to Pine Tree State if I provide a grievance or die data to ACB?

If any employee is treed by ACB on a grievance given by you, your interests are safe-guarded/protected by ACB.

Total Views : 6